Score:0

Unable to launch Xubuntu from VB VM. Failure to "Load Kernel modules", "Flush Journal to Persistent Storage" & start "udev Kernel Device Manager"

cz flag

I'm running Xubuntu with Linux 5.15.0-58 (I can't access the terminal to corroborate, this is what the advanced settings in the GRUB say) in a VirtualBox VM. It worked fine with no issues up till today, but now I can't even enter recovery mode.

In normal boot I get:

RETBleed: Warning: Spectre v2 mitigation leaves CPU vulnerable to RETBleed attacks...
/dev/sda5: recovering journal
/dev/sad5: clean, x/x files, x/x blocks
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 41s! [systemd-random-:252]

then goes to a loop of:

ata3.00: status { DRY }
ata3.00: failed to command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
ata3.00: md 60/08:e0:50:2f:10/00:00:01:00:00/40 tag 28 ncq dma 4096 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/)) Emask 0x4 (timeout)

that ends in :

[FAILED] failed to start **udev Kernel Device Manager**

Booting it in the advanced setting of de GRUB gives these errors:

Timed out waiting for device **/dev/disk/by-uuid/3ED6-FAE3**
Dependency falied for **File#n /dev/disk/by-uuid/3ED6-FAE3**
Dependency failed for **/boot/efi**
Dependency failed for **Local File Systems**.
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [systemd-random-:258]
Failed to start **Load Kernel Modules**
Failed to start **Flush Journal to Persistent Storage**

Recovery mode also seems to not work as I get quite a few errors mainly:

failed to start **ACPI event daemon**
failed to start **Remove Sta#ext4 Metadata Checks Snapshots**
   Starting **Recovery mode menu**
failed to start **Recovery mode menu**
[ OK ] reached target **Frendly Recovery Mode**

but it doesn't boot.

mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.