Reload raid at Ubuntu

tt flag

I use Ubuntu with one big Mdadm (raid with two big disks) but: I've got new disk with OS (Ubuntu of course). I'm trying to reload my Mdadm. Without success.

# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid0] [linear] [multipath] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] 
md127 : active raid0 sdb1[0] sdc1[1]
      7813770240 blocks super 1.2 512k chunks
unused devices: <none>

Looks good.

# mdadm --detail --verbose /dev/md127
mdadm: Unknown keyword mdadm
mdadm: Unknown keyword mdadm
           Version : 1.2
     Creation Time : Sat Jun 10 11:18:15 2023
        Raid Level : raid0
        Array Size : 7813770240 (7.28 TiB 8.00 TB)
      Raid Devices : 2
     Total Devices : 2
       Persistence : Superblock is persistent

       Update Time : Sat Jun 10 11:18:15 2023
             State : clean 
    Active Devices : 2
   Working Devices : 2
    Failed Devices : 0
     Spare Devices : 0

            Layout : -unknown-
        Chunk Size : 512K

Consistency Policy : none

              Name : ubuntu:0  (local to host ubuntu)
              UUID : 786a4ae2:c98e11a2:b57c5f25:2cbcea22
            Events : 0

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8       17        0      active sync   /dev/sdb1
       1       8       33        1      active sync   /dev/sdc1

It looks good too but:

# mount /dev/md127 /somewhere/
mount: /somewhere: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md127, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.

I need it back. Do you know what I must to do?

There is maybe some password. How can I know about it?

I sit in a Tesla and translated this thread with Ai:


Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.