Score:0

Is there a way to drive the developers of Ubuntu to reduce the native mouse-clicks for shutting down from four times to one or two?

eh flag

To shut down I have to click on the power button top right, then on shutdown/power off to expand the menu, then on shutdown and then a final window pops on asking me if I am sure.

enter image description here

Is this necessary? Why is there not ONE button to switch off? Why do Ubuntu developers think it is a good way to having people install add-ons or hack around to beeing able to do this?

in flag
Probably because humans are remarkably inaccurate when pointing with anything but a finger. Heck, based on the sort of things colleagues ask for help with, the myriad of "Are you sure" confirmations one faces throughout the day do little to stop unintentional actions. All this aside, would removing the shutdown confirmation be sufficient?
bomben avatar
eh flag
If you ask me I would say the extra step 2 that came in to expand the menu is too much. I would rather remove this one instead of the final confirmation to shutdown. Just present the menu as large as it is shown on my picture when clicking top right (of course also cancel the extra line `shutdown/logoff` then).
FedKad avatar
cn flag
You are right @bomben. The shutdown, restart or logout sequence was much more efficient in 18.04.
bomben avatar
eh flag
@vanadium I rephrased my question.
user535733 avatar
cn flag
The Ubuntu developers have repeatedly stated that they want to carry as close to upstream Gnome as possible, are not interested in maintaining a lot of patches or customizations, and generally refer design suggestions to Gnome. Complaints or rants about Gnome design should be directed to the nearest trash bin. *Constructive participation* in Gnome design is welcomed by the Gnome developers.
bomben avatar
eh flag
@user535733 I am not familiar with who is doing which part of development but I am thankful for the clarification. However, I think the criticism I posted was quite constructive.
user535733 avatar
cn flag
The phrasing rides the line between constructive vs. complaint in my culture. Gnome developers, like people everywhere, can be a bit touchy and defensive if approached in the wrong way. The term *participation* means exactly that -- the Gnome designers tend to ignore drive-by ideas and listen only to folks who stick around and contribute.
bomben avatar
eh flag
I appreciate your input. I updated my Ubuntu and recognised the issue. Then I read the linked answer here (to which mine was a duplicate) and all those answers suggest working around the issue, basically saying: What you want to do (click once to shutdown) is not the right way to do it. I think if you develop something you should be able to hear "normal" people that are not involved in the engineering process but who are using the software. However, I would be happy to contribute, especially on this issue. How should I do it? Can I file a feature request somewhere? Might I even code?
bomben avatar
eh flag
@user535733 I know the question was deleted, but did you read my last questions relating to it? where/how can I contribute?
user535733 avatar
cn flag
Start the process of participation and contribution at gnome.org.
mangohost

Post an answer

Most people don’t grasp that asking a lot of questions unlocks learning and improves interpersonal bonding. In Alison’s studies, for example, though people could accurately recall how many questions had been asked in their conversations, they didn’t intuit the link between questions and liking. Across four studies, in which participants were engaged in conversations themselves or read transcripts of others’ conversations, people tended not to realize that question asking would influence—or had influenced—the level of amity between the conversationalists.